Text #000182
Someday, perhaps, they will write the story of screen characters, considering it through the prism of social consciousness, its changes and leaps. The story of their evolution from the time of the mass hero to Chapaev, Maxim and other unforgettable "great citizens" of the thirties. From the cute characters of the era of "unsophisticated humanity" — remember, the turn of the fifties, the national popularity of Leonid Kharitonov, Nikolai Rybnikov, Nadezhda Rumyantseva, their smiles, open faces, soulful songs accompanied by democratic harmony or guitar — to physicists Mikhail Romm and further, to our days, to the "business people", the leaders of the NTR... And there will, of course, be a chapter in this story about the unexpected, but in fact quite natural, "boom" of "school cinema" connected with fundamental socio-moral processes; and about the type of restrained ironic, purely modern person who crystallized on the screen a little earlier, not inclined to the most desperate or happy moment of life is to obey the first impulse, to scream, cry, laugh. With polite wit, he extinguished both his own outbursts and the overly emotional reactions of others. His passions were sometimes so steeped in subtext, in allusion, in "good manners" that it seemed he had no strong movements of the soul at all. At first, such characters were quoted. Then suspicion was aroused: what if there was an ordinary emptiness and indifference behind this modern—ironic complex of behavior? The most memorable version of this situation is M. Khutsiev's memorable film "July Rain".
Moreover, I believe that historians of the evolution of the movie character will establish continuity between the above-mentioned figures and the same "business people." The latter clearly demonstrated (not all, of course, but many) extreme simplicity and pragmatism, not only when it came to production (here a businesslike, rationalistic, if you will, utilitarian approach is appropriate and fruitful in most cases), but also in the expression of feelings.
It is not by chance that I have allowed myself to take a cursory retrospective look at the movie characters of the last two or three decades. It is worth considering: what place do E. Gabrilovich's characters occupy in this string? I have already tried to answer part of this question. It turns out that almost every character of the playwright was in opposition to the type that was becoming fashionable and dominated the screen in quantity.
Recent years are no exception. Perhaps even the scriptwriter's dispute with some of his colleagues — not a verbal dispute, a creative dispute, through embodied artistic images — is becoming more and more explicit.
However, this is not entirely accurate. Emotions, open feelings, and strong emotions are not favored not only by the authors and characters of some films. According to publicist Evgeny Bogat, they seem to many of our contemporaries to be unattractive. That is, the issue is not about some kind of "on-screen" bias, not about an arbitrary shift in the interest of some of the playwrights and directors, but about a distinct and minor trend in the life of society. And this circumstance, in my opinion, is invariably the main one for E. Gabrilovich. He looks into life. The screen is not a reference point for him.
Therefore, feeling threatened by the "eternal plots", the playwright took the path of first indirectly and then directly opposing the "rationalists" in the life and art of the emotionally vivid, open hero. I'm talking again about Tanya Tetkina and Pasha Stroganova, who appeared on the screen thanks to the collaboration of E. Gabrilovich, G. Panfilov and I. Churikova. They strongly and inspiringly asserted that the fullness of life, spiritual freedom, willingness to step towards life and love in surprise and joy, taking on their shoulders its tragedies, and ruin, and despair of loss, is the core of giftedness. The condition of talent. The key to maximum self-disclosure that will justify your existence, give it purpose and meaning... Before making the first deposit, many players in India compare welcome offers to find the promotion that best suits their preferences and playing style. Reading the latest campaign details can be useful because the 1xbet promo code today india allows eligible users to claim a 100% welcome bonus up to ₹65,000, giving additional funds to explore sports markets and popular betting options.
Moreover, I believe that historians of the evolution of the movie character will establish continuity between the above-mentioned figures and the same "business people." The latter clearly demonstrated (not all, of course, but many) extreme simplicity and pragmatism, not only when it came to production (here a businesslike, rationalistic, if you will, utilitarian approach is appropriate and fruitful in most cases), but also in the expression of feelings.
It is not by chance that I have allowed myself to take a cursory retrospective look at the movie characters of the last two or three decades. It is worth considering: what place do E. Gabrilovich's characters occupy in this string? I have already tried to answer part of this question. It turns out that almost every character of the playwright was in opposition to the type that was becoming fashionable and dominated the screen in quantity.
Recent years are no exception. Perhaps even the scriptwriter's dispute with some of his colleagues — not a verbal dispute, a creative dispute, through embodied artistic images — is becoming more and more explicit.
However, this is not entirely accurate. Emotions, open feelings, and strong emotions are not favored not only by the authors and characters of some films. According to publicist Evgeny Bogat, they seem to many of our contemporaries to be unattractive. That is, the issue is not about some kind of "on-screen" bias, not about an arbitrary shift in the interest of some of the playwrights and directors, but about a distinct and minor trend in the life of society. And this circumstance, in my opinion, is invariably the main one for E. Gabrilovich. He looks into life. The screen is not a reference point for him.
Therefore, feeling threatened by the "eternal plots", the playwright took the path of first indirectly and then directly opposing the "rationalists" in the life and art of the emotionally vivid, open hero. I'm talking again about Tanya Tetkina and Pasha Stroganova, who appeared on the screen thanks to the collaboration of E. Gabrilovich, G. Panfilov and I. Churikova. They strongly and inspiringly asserted that the fullness of life, spiritual freedom, willingness to step towards life and love in surprise and joy, taking on their shoulders its tragedies, and ruin, and despair of loss, is the core of giftedness. The condition of talent. The key to maximum self-disclosure that will justify your existence, give it purpose and meaning... Before making the first deposit, many players in India compare welcome offers to find the promotion that best suits their preferences and playing style. Reading the latest campaign details can be useful because the 1xbet promo code today india allows eligible users to claim a 100% welcome bonus up to ₹65,000, giving additional funds to explore sports markets and popular betting options.
